About Me

Colleen Gillis has been recruiting many years, working with national corporate organizations as well as small independent operations. Her expertise on the hiring climate in Canada, best candidate pratices, and employment standards have been a valuable resorce for candidates searching for the next step in their career.
Showing posts with label Work and life balance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Work and life balance. Show all posts

Monday, November 01, 2010

Happy at Work?

Amazingly, most of us will spend half of our waking lives at work. Are you happy?

Few people can combine earning a living with a genuine passion. Most people essentially trade half of their life in return for money to enjoy the other half.

Yet, we can find great meaning in our work without that job having to be cancer research or working for Greenpeace. We just need to find the meaning within the work we're doing or make that meaning clear.


Step 1. Find the purpose

Essentially, we all want to feel part of something bigger, so the first step is seeing that bigger picture or purpose in our work. For leaders, it can be as simple as focusing on the why, as much as the how, when communicating with teams. Of course, the purpose needs to feel inherently meaningful. Profits are a perfectly good goal but they make a lousy purpose.

For many teams, we think the customer experience can provide that bigger purpose. It's not world peace, but improving the customer experience is a lot more inherently meaningful than just increasing margins. A focus on customer experience is essentially about understanding customers and creating a positive experience for them. Making them feel good. Even if we're selling hot dogs, we can find some inherent meaning in improving the customer's experience during that sale.


We humans aren't such a bad bunch; for the most part we actually enjoy making other people happy, especially those drawn to working in hospitality. You know the little thrill we get when someone drops something in the street we can hand it back to them? It took no real effort on our part, of course, but we still enjoy having done a good thing. Almost all of us are hard-wired with a little empathy and generosity. We find some meaning in focusing on another person's experience.

Step 2. See the individual contribution

Next, once we have an effort worth being part of, we need to see the individual role we personally play in that overall effort. We empathetic, generous humans are also a more than a little egotistical. So although we want to be part of something bigger, we don't want to disappear completely within it. We're each only one small piece of the puzzle, but we'd like that piece to be noticed and valuable in some way.

Step 3. Encourage ideas

And finally, step three: we want our ideas to be heard. It's another of our human quirks: the desire to have our input considered and to feel that we have some impact on the way things are done. Ask me my opinion, listen to my suggestions and I'll feel much more ownership of our shared goals.


So, the good news is that we're never more than three steps away from making any role meaningful - whether it's answering the phone, making ads or selling insurance. Which is just as well, because we can't all save the whales.

Friday, May 07, 2010

Counter-Offers

Let's examine the idea of counter-offers.

If you're a shinning example of the perfect employee, at some point, you're going to quietly explore your options in the hospitality market. Perhaps you'll contact a recruiter so as to ensure your interest is kept confidential - always a good choice! But what if this exploring leads to a first interview, then a working interview, and then a third? And in due time, you receive an extremely attractive job offer. Do you accept straight away and cheerily return to your current employer with a letter of resignation?

You might be surprised when your boss reads this resignation and implores you to postpone a final decision for a day or two. In a mere few hours, this executive returns and presents you with an even more attractive counter-offer. "We simply can't afford to lose you," your boss explains.

Who knew? And more importantly - what do you do now?

Before you start wishing you had such "problems", let me mention that because of marketplace demands, it's primarily highly qualified managers and executives that are more likely to face this particular conundrum.

There are many legitimate reasons to leave a position for greener pastures...perhaps the company has executed it's expansion plans a couple years ago and is now in maintenance mode, with no fresh challenges on the horizon. Or perhaps a training budget has been slashed to bits - thwartying your intention of upgrading your skills. Or perhaps you just learned the $15,000 yearly bonus you were counting on isn't likely to materialize. Bummer.

So, hence the passive career search for new positions....the terrifc offer....and impending resignation where your boss says, "Tell me what's wrong here, and I'll fix it. But you have to promise to stay. And by the way, here's more money."

Perhaps you should accept the offer, but that won't rectify all problems. Think about your reasons for wanting to leave in the first place. Let's review the situation and consider the following worst-case scenarios that might play out if you decide to stay with your employer.

You're action can change the culture of your organization.

A resignation is the business equivalent of holding your boss at gunpoint: "Give me what I want, or I'm history." The counter-offer is the equivalent of your boss handing over cash, a promotion, less travel or more time off, and putting your gun back into its holster.

But the incident isn't over. In fact, it may never be. You have upset an apple cart and provoked a panic-buy. Those apples can never be stacked the same way, and everything, including the company's pecking order, is now different. Passive aggression and veiled hostility might arise later from some unexpected sources.

If co-workers hear of your new title and/or perks, a new dynamic will develop. You won't exactly be the most popular guy or gal on campus. However minor your perks, don't underestimate how little it takes to make co-workers angry; inequality within the ranks is lethal. If you decide to stay where you are because it is familiar, you might be surprised. By accepting the counteroffer's perks, that familiar office dynamic will become foreign.

You'll raise the stakes.

Your acceptance of a counteroffer will change expectation levels - both for your boss and for yourself.

After bestowing rewards, it is human nature for your boss to expect more from you. You'll be held to a higher performance standard, which you might also hold yourself because of guilt from stirring up muddy waters. Your every misstep will be scrutinized, and every minor error in judgment will be magnified. In other words, you'll earn every penny of that increased salary and every minute of that family leave time with your blood, sweat and tears.

You won't be trusted.

You're no longer a team player, but someone who, first and foremost, looks out for No. 1. You've already stated in effect, "I don't really want to be here." Because you've broken the loyalty oath and held your employer hostage, you'll be henceforth viewed as less than committed. Your allegiance also will be compromised in your own mind; something about the job just won't feel "right."

Perceived lack of loyalty in addition to co-worker resentment and an employer's feelings of disempowerment could lead to a short-lived position. I've witnessed many workers who've happily accepted counter-offers in winter only to leave by the next summer. Unfortunately, upon leaving this upheaval, the employee no longer will receive a good solid reference. S/he more than likely will receive a two-word negative response, if any.

Accepting a counter-offer isn't always a bad decision, but as a professional recruiter, I'd be remiss if I didn't urge a very close look at the possible pitfalls. My ultimate goal is seeing candidates happy and successful in permanent placements, whatever and wherever those might be. So I'd also encourage a talk with the boss before you start shopping around, rather than after. Address your misgivings and dissatisfactions early; give him a fair chance to rectify them. It's quite possible that nothing will change - but be assured that you haven't wasted your time.

You've called the boss' attention to the situation in an honest, straightforward way. You've acted with integrity while gaining the assurance of knowing how much you're truly valued - without jeopardizing your career, your economic stability or your positive relationships with peers. And without pulling out the verbal equivalent of an Uzi.

What's more, if you ultimately decide to leave the company for a warmer climate, your boss will be able to accept this and not be suprised.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Frugal Ideas to Manage in a Struggling Economy

In a difficult economy, many companies look at a wide spectrum of options to reduce labour costs. This is no different in the hospitality industry over the past year and a half where we've seen managers and front line staff laid off, hours cut for entry level workers, and increased demand on the remaining management and team that is asked to cope with less, and do more, in lieu of the struggling economy.

In order to retain these people that we rely on to manage at this time, look to some ideas provided by the Families and Work Institute(FWI). These frugal tips may help save your organization money while also creating a positive work environment that will encourage staff loyalty and peak performance:


1. Giving head office employees four Fridays off in the summer in lieu of raises the organization cannot afford.

2. Providing employees with information to better manage their own finances.

3. Allowing head office employees to work at home one to two days a week to save on commuting costs in response to fluctuating gas prices.

4. Creating funds to support their own employees or others in the community who are suffering during the recession.

5. Giving employees the option to take unlimited, unpaid personal time off during the downturn, while keeping full medical benefits and the right to return to their jobs.

6. Allowing employees greater scheduling flexibility if their spouse has lost a job or seen their hours reduced and the family needs to make changes.

7. Creating flex-year and flex-career programs.

8. Creating workflow coordinators to monitor overwork and creating wellness scorecards to promote wellness.

9. Providing a coach for new parents.

"In many ways, the recession has led increasing numbers of employers to improve their workplaces so that they work for the employer and the employees during these difficult times," said Ellen Gallinsky, president and co-founder of FWI.

[Source: Human Resources Leader, 29 September 2009]

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Worry About Your Income No Longer......

At long last, the news we've been waiting for. Time to put in your notice and book your ticket to Sun and Fun! A new study published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health shows that you needent worry about YOUR income and education.....just marry well! The study suggests that the education and income level of your spouse are very important indicators of your mortality, independent of your own education and income level.

According to this study, men married to well-educated women had longer lifespans, all else equal. The researchers suggest that the cause of this might be related to the sharing of information that occurs in close relationships. Well-educated people tend to be better able to take advantage of knowledge about healthy behaviors.

And the critical indicator for a wife's longevity? Her husband's income level or social class.

So if you want to live longer, marry a smart woman or a wealthy man!

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Money Talk in an Interview

The Money Question – it always comes up in interviews …

The money question always comes up in job interviews. If you are a candidate looking at a new position, you can safely assume the person on the other side of the desk will ask some form of the money question. Your answer may be the difference between moving forward and being eliminated.

In an interview, the employer has four basic questions in mind. However they dress them up, whatever creative spin they put on them, employers really want to know four things:

Who are you?
Why are you here?
What can you do for me?
How much will it cost?

That final question can make or break the situation. If you answer it wrong, you're done. The correct answer is non - numerical. A number, whether too high or too low, is ALWAYS wrong.

The employer will invariably ask something like, "How much money do you need to consider for this position?" Or else, "What will it take for you to come to work for our company?"

If you want to be considered for the position do NOT, under any circumstances, give a numerical answer. The correct answer is something on the order of, "I'm here to discuss the position and assess my fit with your organization. I want to make sure my talents are a good match for the duties you're outlining. You're probably thinking along the same lines. I am sure, if we get to that place, we can reach an accommodation."

Why answer that way? Because it's the truth.

The demand - interest barometer tells us that, for a candidate, as demands go up, interest goes down. And as interest goes up, demands go down. If you as a candidate articulate a number too early in the process, you're drawing a line in the sand and creating an impression that you're more about reward than effort, more about price than value.

A number which is either too high or too low is wrong for several reasons.

The interviewer will eliminate you from consideration if you articulate a number that's too high. Whether they can afford the amount you say or whether you're worth that amount is immaterial. If you as the candidate create the impression that you overvalue your skills (in other words say any number above the range they've calculated), they are concerned you will never "settle" for the amount they're offering. So they will remove you from the process.

Conversely, if you say a number that's too low, you might inadvertently wind up accepting compensation less than the amount the company budgeted because that's what you said. You reduced your ability to negotiate because you have too little information.

Over the years, in coaching people on successful interviewing techniques, the money question is the one where people stumble most often. Many times people will tell me, "I just wasn't prepared for the question ... the number just popped out of my mouth." Or else they will say, "I told her $X because I think I'm worth it."

Bottom line, it doesn't matter what YOU think you're worth. The magic number is always somewhere in the range between what they want to pay and what you think you should get. This has been my experience.

When the employer asks, "How much ... ? " the right answer is, "We'll know when we get there." If they ask again, insisting on an answer, defer diplomatically a second time. Something on the order of, "I appreciate you want a number. I'm a little uncomfortable making anything which could be perceived as a demand at this early stage. I'm interested in the position and would like to learn more."

And if they ask a third time, the correct answer is, "My year to date compensation is $Z."

But why give a number that way? Simple. It's a statement of fact, not an estimate of self-esteem. You compensation is verifiable. An employer can ask for and receive verification of income. You pay taxes. Your income is a public record. In the real world, your current or most recent employer valued you at an identified level. That's the number to share.

So ... don't get caught by the money question. Role play with a friend or practice in the mirror. Be prepared for this inevitable question. Your ability to answer the money question with an non-answer can get you the job or get you more money for the job you really want.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

When Will You Retire?

As the global market volatility continues to cut into many superannuation balances, an increasing number of workers are planning to delay their retirement - whether they like it or not.

Across much of Canada, mandatory retirement has been given the pink slip.
On July 1, 2009, Nova Scotia became the latest province to enact legislation to amend its human rights code and end the practice. As of that date, workers in the province are no longer forced to quit when they turn 65. "Many want to continue working, as they still have a lot to contribute," says Graham Steele, who was at the time the acting minister responsible for the Human Rights Act.

That was certainly the thinking in other provinces — such as British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Saskatchewan, and Ontario — when they moved in the past few years to eliminate mandatory retirement.

As people remain in the workforce for longer - many out of necessity rather than want - HR managers will need to closely monitor changing employee attitudes and consider redefining some of their policies to fit.

It has been shown that those with the most education tend to enjoy their work and are reluctant to be turfed out. And many people want to keep working for a variety of other reasons, including because they enjoy the office camaraderie, sense of purpose or routine.

Sometimes it's a case of economic survival.

Statistics Canada says the numbers of retirement-aged Canadians in the workforce will continue to increase — in less than 10 years, one in five people in the workforce will be aged 55 to 64.

This shift in demographics is not new, but what's surprising is the extent of the delay in planned retirement, indicating that potentially, we could be in for an even more dramatic shift in the makeup of our labour force than first expected.

As older workers remain at organisations for longer, it will be important for employers to reconsider how they will retain the engagement of their older employees to ensure they are able to continue to propel their organiaation forward.

Some workers may feel forced to remain in their jobs when they'd rather not be there. Employers will have to consider how they can best approach this: If older workers feel compelled to continue working when they'd rather be doing something else, employers will need to work doubly hard to maintain their motivation and job satisfaction, both of which impact their productivity.

Organizations may have to be more creative and flexible in their workplace strategies to allow older workers to remain productive and engaged in their roles. They may need to consider adjusting some of their workplace practices to suit the increased flexibility older workers are looking for. This may extend beyond the more typical work-life balance policies to pay and leave practices, work-from-home arrangements, even to job and role redesign to get the greatest productivity from older workers.

Employers need to consider how best to assist older workers to stay focused on work. As an example, concern about money matters can be a great source of stress or distraction for employees, and the employer can be an important conduit to providing information to help alleviate these concerns and assist employees in preparing for their retirement. Providing access to financial education and advice could be of great value to older workers.

For those employees nearing retirement, the employer has an important role to play in helping to smooth the path to retirement. Their role can range from providing access to information or a professional adviser - who can help older workers recalibrate their financial plan or investment allocation to help them meet their financial goals and ensure they have the most appropriate strategy in place - through to working in partnership to find solutions such as phased retirement strategies that will benefit both employer and employee.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Stressed Out? How it affects your Decisions

How Stress Genders Decision Making

Many people in the hospitality industry arestressed out these days - those looking for work and those holding down the fort with extra hats to wear - are beyond their normal stress levels over the past 6-8 months. I mentioned in a previous article that men in Canada are more affected than women with job loss recently and here's a tip about dealing with stress from male/female perspective.

While it's been documented for some time that men take more risks than women (and, thus, are more likely to die violently or have addictive behaviors), a recent study indicates that this gap widens even further when stress is introduced.

When stress indicators as measured by cortisol levels were higher in women, their decision making was less risky than than their control group. Men, on the other hand, made more risky decisions when stressed than their control group did.

To test decision making under stress, participants' hands were placed in ice water while they performed a gambling game involving blowing up a simulated balloon on a computer screen. Points were accumulated with each pump of the balloon, but each pump also increased the risk of the balloon popping, resulting in a loss of all points.

The lesson here? Try to be aware of your gendered inclinations when you feel stressed out, so that you make the most responsible (men!) or effective (ladies!) decision. Consider what you'd normally do, and come up with a plan of action rather than react unthinkingly.

The bottom line? Don't worry, be happy!

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Avoiding the "Overqualified" Label

Most hospitality candidates preparing for a job interview worry about whether they'll be able to come off as experienced, educated, and a personality "fit" enough to make a positive impression on hotel and restaurant corporate managers. But job seekers with substantial schooling or a lengthy work history often face the opposite problem.

Highly qualified candidates in the industry are sometimes forced to grapple with the stigma of being labeled “overqualified.” Often, hiring managers who encounter an applicant with a bounty of education or experience fear that they will be unable to meet the candidate’s salary requirements or other job expectations.

Having recruited in the industry for many years, I've come to understand people have various life/work factors where an "overqualified" candidate will apply for a less senior role with full awareness of a change in salary, work hours, work expectations, and work environment. These various factors, such as a new child in the home, relocation to a smaller community, downsizing to have more free time, are motivating factors that come to outweigh the step down.

According to human resources and staffing consultant Ken Gaffey, the phrase “overqualified” is often a code word that hiring managers use to express concern about a candidate’s fitness for the position. In order to get past the “overqualified” stigma and land your dream job, you have to be able to discern the true source of the hiring manager’s hesitation -- and then move in to neutralize it. These tips can help you move past the overqualified label and sail to success in your next interview:

1. Address the situation directly.
If there’s a special reason why you’re in the market for a lower-level position, it might help to discuss it upfront. For example, if you’re looking to establish yourself in a new field, or if you want to reduce your work schedule, let the hiring manager know.

2. Put your skill set front and center.
A great way to dodge the overqualified label is to take the focus off of your career path as a whole, and instead emphasize the skills and abilities you’ve picked up along the way. The functional résumé format – which job search gurus often recommend to recent grads and inexperienced jobseekers – may be the best option for highly qualified candidates, as well.

3. Signal your flexibility on salary.
One of the major reasons hiring managers shy away from highly experienced candidates is the perception that their salary expectations will be out of line with the position. If you recognize the difference in salary for the position you're applying, let the hiring manager know from the get-go how your expectations fit their range. Emphasize your unique value to the organization.

4. Make it clear that personality won’t be a problem.
The hiring manager may be worried that you won’t be able to work effectively alongside less-experienced peers. To allay these concerns, choose answers that will help you cast yourself as a humble team player who can get along well with people from all walks of life.

5. Let them know you’re in it for the long haul.
It’s often assumed that highly qualified candidates are just looking for a temporary job to tide them over until something better comes along. Leave no doubt that you intend to dedicate yourself long-term in your new role and that the company values speak to your professional goals and how you can help them achieve sucess.

Like many obstacles you’ll face in your job search, being “overqualified” is only a problem if you don’t take the opportunity to turn it around to your advantage! By carefully highlighting your skills and thinking strategically about ways to minimize the potential for problems, you’ll be able to turn this perceived liability into a strength.

For those "overqualified" candidates that have been on a long-term career path and now searching for a new position, you might want to hone your interview skills with our free Online Interview Prep Course. Email us to set up access at info@targetprofessionals.com.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

The Spirit of Hospitality

You may not be particularly religious, but this article is a compelling perspective on the hospitality industry and very thought provoking. Although I've adapted and shortened this, it's still long, yet worth the effort....

"The Christian humanization of work: job satisfaction in the hospitality industry."
by James Spillane written in 2001 for Review of Business

The tourism sector is the largest industry in the world. Today it is estimated to provide about 255 million jobs and amounts to 10 percent of world employment. It has now grown into a modern, mature industry where workers are forming their professional identity. These "hospitality professionals" are primarily concerned with customer satisfaction.

Workers in the service sector find the fruits of their labor are frequently intangible. In some cases, their emotions are involved. One can easily broaden management guru Peter Drucker's concept of "the knowledge worker" to include "the emotion worker," who must deal with people on a more interpersonal level. In our modem, service-oriented society, there is a need for literature devoted to the special needs of this kind of worker, especially in the area of "spirituality of work"

By its very nature, hospitality work has a spiritual dimension. Of all industries, it is the most intensely interactive, with people serving people and providing comfort, sustenance, conviviality, transport, amusement, enlightenment, employment and much more. Given the complexity of human behavior, concerns about the work's spiritual dimension can be neither ignored nor hidden. For this reason, perhaps the most challenging of all hospitality industry problems today is not so much job satisfaction as a proper spirituality of work.

In short, the challenge is to help hospitality professionals find genuine meaningfulness in their work.

Spirituality of Work

Today people are less and less sure about what "work" really means. Their expectations of work, especially getting it and enjoying it, are now matters of both deep anxiety and mundane reality. There are several reasons for this. First, there are high unemployment rates in industrialized societies. For many people in modern society, work is no longer something that happens in a fixed place during a fixed unit of time, producing a fixed output and reward (5). Come points out how societies frequently define human beings in terms of the work they perform (7). The question "what do you do?" is a central one in many people's lives.

Religion teaches that work is its own reward, and that it will lead a person toward the virtuous life, if not salvation. Work is the natural course of action a human follows to find his or her role, niche, position, and the shape of his or her soul. Therefore, steady employment, a life in which one's lot continually improves, sits as the cornerstone of rational and calculable human action. It may well be the cornerstone of physical and mental health as well. How can it not shape the nature of spirituality?

It is in the work and working that a person's consciousness takes shape and life reveals its meaning. For it is in working that a person believes he or she has made sense of life's mystery and has found reasonable ways to avoid vexing metaphysical questions. For the content and structure of a person's consciousness, story and spirit remain his or her work, or lack of it.

Faith and the World of Work. Wright points out that many contemporary Christians experience some discomfort when they seek to relate their faith to the world of work, especially the work of wealth creation in industry, commerce and other services (27). The workplace is perceived as a Godless and even immoral part of their human condition. As a result, many people feel the need to find consistency between their work and the rest of their life.

Why should one be concerned with the relationship between faith, work, and the world of wealth creation and provision of services? First of all, work is where most people spend a great deal of their time. Second, the creation of wealth and provision of services are the processes whereby all people survive on this earth, since they serve to satisfy their needs and wants.

Finally, and most important, there is a unique Christian truth and revelation: the Incarnation. Christians believe that, in Jesus, God became human at a particular moment of time and lived on this same earth that we inhabit. Jesus was very much involved in the world of work of his day. Many of his stories came from everyday life and the workplace. The world of work and wealth creation is very clearly part of God's creation, and God took part in these very activities. Hence, there is a need to relate them to our Christian beliefs and to face up to any discomfort we perceive and feel in doing so.

The Nature of Spirituality

Spirituality has become a broad, inclusive term that is no longer confined to, or defined by, religion. It names a human reality difficult to define but whose patterns can be verified in quite different religions and movements. Spirituality now focuses on the human spirit of believers and non-believers in their lives as a whole; that is, on the physical and emotional, the intellectual and social, the political and cultural, and the secular and religious dimensions of their lives.
According to Thompson, a person's spirituality is individual and collective, and reflects how a person responds to God's initiative while facing the challenges of everyday life within his or her specific historical and cultural environment (25).

Faith, Love and Hope Replace Obedience. According to Regan, personal development of healthy human qualities occupies a more central position in one's personal outlook toward spirituality today (19). Accepting what is authentically human leads people to use their native talents, creative expressions and heightened personal initiatives. On the other hand, anything that dehumanizes a service provider or "receiver" in the hospitality industry is viewed as unChristian. This approach allows more emphasis on an individual's personal response of his or her religious and inner values, both human and Christian. Empowerment, decentralization, co-responsibility and subsidiarity become the new hallmarks of what was once viewed as religious "obedience."

With today's personal response-to-inner values approach, there's a greater emphasis placed on personal responsibility and individuality. In this approach to the spiritual life, a person is viewed as entering a profession or a community to develop oneself fully in the service of Christ and neighbor, to put one's full talents at the disposal of people, and to take part in and share responsibility for the Church and for the community itself. Rather than obedience, selfless charity becomes the primary Christian virtue. Life itself is seen as a response of love to God and in the neighbor in accordance with Jesus' teaching. This approach seems particularly appropriate for hospitality professionals, whose training now emphasizes their empowerment to make decisions by themselves.

It is not easy to affirm the dignity of work and the worker when the characteristic form of work in an industrial society is symbolized by the assembly line. Repetitively carrying out a mechanical task gives faint image of the worker as a sharer in God's creative activity. It was much easier to promote the Christian vision of labor in a pre-industrial society when the dominant form of work was a craft, with the worker involved in the entire production process. The same is true of work in the service sector, including the hospitality industry.

New work structures, therefore, pose challenges, but also offer opportunities. To be efficient, the new workplace requires employees to take pride in their work and each other, and promoting such feelings can provide multiple benefits for any manager. It fosters loyalty toward the firm and one's fellow workers. At the same time, the experience of building solidarity vindicates a traditional Christian understanding of the dignity of the human person. For Wright, the starting point for a Christian perspective on the world of work is Teilbard's divinization of human activity (27). The Incarnation substantially strengthens that perception, showing that the tension and paradox in the human condition are part of our working lives.

Work is an act of self-giving directed toward the good of others. Work consists primarily of cultivating and care, in bringing forth new life. Work should basically be a joyful activity, even though it often entails fatigue and pain. Don't forget, though, that rest and leisure are good, too, and are, in their own way, integral to the work process.

Spirituality of Work for Hospitality Professionals

There are many qualities of life rooted in the example of Jesus, with three basic qualities specifically reflecting Jesus' life of hospitable service to others: responsiveness, competence and respect.

Underlying Jesus' desire to serve those in need were sensitivity, adaptability and willingness that are today basic building blocks for an apostolic spirituality of hospitality. Sensitivity to the situation at hand is essential if a hospitality professional's response is to be effective. Adaptability to the situation as it changes is also essential if their response is to be appropriate. Willingness to be involved is essential if their response is to be consistent Ultimately, the driving force behind this responsiveness is compassion, which is not the same as pity. The true core of compassion is the urgency to act. Compassion never merely observes; it initiates and interacts. In Jesus' work, compassion is second only to love. On the other hand, when personal benefit becomes the primary goal of service in the hospitality industry, this compassion gives way to conceit.

Competence shapes the overall effectiveness of our response. However sensitive, adaptable and willing that response maybe, its lasting effect must reflect competence. Service industries require a level of competence quite different from that in agricultural or manufacturing work. The hospitality industry revolves around two separate realities: material variables and personal variables. Material variables differ among the various areas of the hospitality industry, but they generally include some common elements. First, there is a body of living knowledge, with new information replacing old on a regular basis. (I use the word "living" in the sense of growing and changing.) Second, there are natural or acquired skills that enable hospitality professionals to use their knowledge. Third, there are the willingness, capacity and commitment to acquire new and refined skills to match developments within the field of knowledge now called hospitality, leisure or tourism studies. Finally, there are resources necessary for hospitality professionals to use skills with knowledge. Personal variables for hospitality professionals include the personalities, preferences and predicaments of those they serve.

Respect is characterized by a hospitality professional's recognition of each person's uniqueness. It is their affirmation of the dignity of each person, a dignity based on their creation as God's image and likeness, as well as their efforts to listen, communicate and interact through ways and means consistent with that uniqueness and dignity. Work in the hospitality industry brings professionals to encounters and interactions with many people. Respect reminds them that, regardless of what they have to do in the work of hospitality, the value of a human being can never be compromised.

The driving force behind respect is love. Christian spirituality should acknowledge the goodness of all that is human. Emotions, sexuality, temperament, personality and the prayer life should all enter into the Christian response of the whole person. Development and fulfillment of these truly human aspects should be incorporated into any authentic approach to the Christian spirituality of work in the hospitality industry.

Job Satisfaction in the Hospitality Industries

The "rational" parts of any organization put a high value on efficiency. All jobs and tasks should be designed to achieve the organization's goals as efficiently as possible. Jobs are specialized along two dimensions: horizontally (restricting the range of different tasks) and vertically (restricting the range of control and decision-making over job activities). Job specialization is most obvious at the operating levels of organizations. However, highly specialized work can injure the well-being of workers and thus poses an important problem of justice for employers (for example, unskilled workers without freedom of choice). Such injustice can actually lead to decreased productivity.

On the other hand, there is a significant link between worker productivity and programs that improve the quality of the work life of workers by giving greater involvement in, and control over, a variety of work tasks. Velasquez [26] points out that there are two determinants of job satisfaction:

1. Experienced Meaningfulness. The individual must perceive his or her work as worthwhile or important by some system of values he or she accepts.

2. Knowledge of Results. The worker must be able to determine, on some regular basis, whether or not the outcomes of his or her work are satisfactory.

To influence these determinants, jobs must be expanded along five dimensions:

1. Skill Variety. The degree to which a job requires the worker to perform activities that challenge his or her skills and abilities.

2. Task Identity. The degree to which the job requires completing a whole and identifiable piece of work -- doing a job from beginning to end with a visible outcome.

3. Task Significance. The degree to which a job has a substantial and perceivable impact on the lives of other people, whether in the immediate organization or the world at large.

4. Autonomy. The degree to which the job gives the worker freedom, independence and discretion in scheduling work and determining how he or she will carry it out

5. Feedback. The degree to which a worker, in carrying out the work activities required by the job, gets information about the effectiveness of his or her efforts.

Traditionally, employees have relied on their supervisors for task guidance and good feelings--especially consideration and being treated like adults in order to perform their jobs both well and happily. Schneider and Bowen point out that when employees do not get this from their supervisors, they may turn to customers as "substitutes for leadership"

(20). Customers may be given a say in designing the organization that produces the goods and services. With services, it's often possible--and desirable--for customers to actually participate in production.

But the problem is that customers are not subject to the same kinds of fears, commitments and structures as employees, so they are very difficult to manage. To best capitalize on customer competencies, management must be able to:

1. Explicitly determine exactly what role/job they want their customer to perform.

2. Ensure that customers have what it takes to perform their jobs well through role clarity, ability and motivation.

3. Regularly appraise customer performance.

Service customers also often play the roles of directors, guides and even "order-givers" for employees. Customers play a dual leadership role by providing employees with guidance and providing them with positive feelings. There are two reasons. First, the employees' supervisors tend not to provide the guidance and good feelings they should. Second, customers of service firms feel they have a right to give orders. Employees like the positive feelings they receive from customers but do not like customers telling them what to do.

The lesson here is fairly simple but too often overlooked: Feedback is a critical part of job enrichment. Service firms need to think creatively about how to respond to these opposite reactions to customers' leadership behaviors. Customers can be trained to be a source of good feelings for employees and, at the same time, socialized to limit task direction over employees. Although management may have great "legitimate influence" over its employees, service work puts employees closer to their customers and, therefore, more involved with the kinds of rewards they receive and the distribution of those rewards. When a hospitality enterprise meets the various needs of employees through rewards--dispersed equitably and fairly--customers will experience superior service quality as well.

Combining Job Satisfaction with Spirituality for Hospitality Professionals

Mainardi has pointed out that hospitality professionals are dependent on contact with, and reception of, the public (14). Therefore, they presuppose some degree of availability toward the client, a considerable margin of initiative and a generally strong sense of personal responsibility. In fact, employees in the tourist transaction play an intermediary role between the industry's structure and its clientele. This role is particularly decisive in achieving the results desired by both sides. AM these situations are undoubtedly favorable to bearing witness to the spirit and practice of the Gospel before others.

The hospitality professional's conduct is not only circumscribed by the material manifestations of the tourist industry. It must also be determined by psychological and ethical factors aimed at completely satisfying the tourist's wishes. Tourists want to be treated differently--better--than they are normally treated in their daily routines (e.g., with tradesmen, fellow workers, etc.). Furthermore, there is substantial evidence that customers like to interact directly with people in the tourism trade, not machines. This is also unavoidable, since providing tourist services without human assistance remains inconceivable.

This contact with the hurried or solitary traveler enables tourist professionals to reveal their own personalities--both as expert and human being--responding to each client's unique wishes via their own mental attitude, manner, initiative and creativity. The human person is truly the central and fundamental point of the tourism industry, with the economic aspect clearly secondary.

Simon used the concept of satisficing behavior to accommodate the balancing act of achieving multiple objectives in human behavior (21). Normative economics fails to include some of the central problems of conflict and dynamics. Simon attacks the hypothesis that firms strive to maximize profits for three key reasons: (1) The theory leaves ambiguous whether it is short-run or long-run profit that is to be maximized; (2) The entrepreneur may obtain all kinds of "psychic income" from the firm apart from monetary rewards; and (3) the entrepreneur may simply want to earn a satisfactory return, not looking to maximize gains. Simon points out that "economic man" is a satisficing animal whose problem-solving is based on his or her search to meet certain aspiration levels, rather than a "maximizing animal" whose problem-solving involves finding the best alternatives in terms of specified criteria This is certainly true in the case of the hospitality professional who seeks job satisfaction rather than merely looking to maximize salary.

The true mark of hospitality professionalism is excellence on the technical level and fellowship toward the client on the moral level. Such a global commitment involves a wide range of material services and mental attitudes in welcoming, guiding and assisting the tourist It also opens up more far-reaching horizons to practice Christian witness in so many privileged circumstances--in the form of personal contacts, conversations, exchanges of view, good conduct, etc. Nevertheless, this world also brings a lot of "baggage" with it for most people in the tourist and similar industries. Such difficulties include stress, high anxiety, burn out, low social status, feeling like a "hired host," low pay, tensions between career and one's personal and family life, as well as high turnover and mobility.

In professional activity, a concrete and unmistakable sign of integrity is to observe professional ethics. In other words, professionals should conduct their business honestly--giving clients the right amount of service and goods proportionate to their requested price. Whether you're talking about a travel agency or a tour company, a hotel or a restaurant, personal service must focus on the needs of the beneficiary of hospitality--i.e., the client Specifically, the 10 dimensions of service quality are: reliability, responsiveness, competence, access, courtesy, communication, credibility, security, understanding/knowing the customer, and tangibles that include the physical evidence of the service.

Generally speaking, hospitality clients are not equipped with the controls and consumer protections many other customers enjoy when they purchase industrial products. With the exception of large-scale fraud, it is, in fact, very difficult for clients to contest the quality of tourist goods or services purchased. In the majority of cases, the tourist client is thus put in an inferior position. That's why it's all too easy for hospitality professionals to "swindle" and behave in unjust and dishonest ways. This is a recurrent risk faced even by the well-intentioned, and one that can only be dispelled if the will to bear witness is cultivated systematically in the depths of the individual conscience.

Regard toward the client's "person" can--and should--be demonstrated by imbuing him or her with a sense of psychological and physical well-being, and by being willing to serve. Customers should also benefit from: material protection of their person and possessions, the constant good functioning of the tourism facilities, professional correctness and an effort by service providers to achieve maximum standards of hygiene (in food and environment). Modern managerial conduct should also aim to overcome the "coldness" and lack of intimacy typical of bureaucratic organizations. What's more, the influence exerted by hospitality managers and their staff may play a significant role in "educating" clients in the use of tourism, whether aimed at recreation or any creative endeavor. In the words of Paul VI, we should strive to "humanize and spiritualize tourism."